<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected SEDCO&#039;s request for intervention in the appeal concerning the taxability of reimbursement of Mobilisation Costs. The Tribunal emphasized the distinct nature of proceedings before a Third Member compared to a Special Bench, stating that intervention was not warranted and could lead to procedural complications. The Tribunal directed the Registry to schedule the reference before the Third Member and issued an interim order to the parties accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected SEDCO&#039;s request for intervention in the appeal concerning the taxability of reimbursement of Mobilisation Costs. The Tribunal emphasized the distinct nature of proceedings before a Third Member compared to a Special Bench, stating that intervention was not warranted and could lead to procedural complications. The Tribunal directed the Registry to schedule the reference before the Third Member and issued an interim order to the parties accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>