<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessments were not in accordance with the law and annulled them. The assessments should have been framed on the executor of the Will of the deceased, not on the legal heirs, which constituted an illegality. The AAC&#039;s decision to set aside the assessments for all years was upheld, emphasizing the lack of proper framing of assessments. Other grounds raised by the appellant were considered irrelevant due to the annulment of the assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessments were not in accordance with the law and annulled them. The assessments should have been framed on the executor of the Will of the deceased, not on the legal heirs, which constituted an illegality. The AAC&#039;s decision to set aside the assessments for all years was upheld, emphasizing the lack of proper framing of assessments. Other grounds raised by the appellant were considered irrelevant due to the annulment of the assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>