<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 89 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the assessment as the assessment proceedings did not include all legal representatives, and the ITO did not prove that Laxmi Chand managed the deceased&#039;s entire estate. The Tribunal stressed the necessity to annul such assessments rather than simply directing fresh proceedings, citing the requirement for full representation of the deceased&#039;s estate by all legal representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 89 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the assessment as the assessment proceedings did not include all legal representatives, and the ITO did not prove that Laxmi Chand managed the deceased&#039;s entire estate. The Tribunal stressed the necessity to annul such assessments rather than simply directing fresh proceedings, citing the requirement for full representation of the deceased&#039;s estate by all legal representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>