<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s petition for a stay of demand, ruling it legally not maintainable as the appeal related to the order under section 263, not the assessment order creating the demand. The decision was based on the principle that the Tribunal&#039;s power to grant a stay of demand is ancillary to the appeal pending before it, directly linked to the disputed demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:03:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s petition for a stay of demand, ruling it legally not maintainable as the appeal related to the order under section 263, not the assessment order creating the demand. The decision was based on the principle that the Tribunal&#039;s power to grant a stay of demand is ancillary to the appeal pending before it, directly linked to the disputed demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>