<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on a registered partnership firm for failing to deliver declarations in Form No. 15H within the prescribed time under section 272A(2)(f) read with section 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s failure was deemed a bona fide mistake due to ignorance of the law, with no guilty intention or benefit derived from the delay, resulting in no loss to the revenue. As a result, the penalty was revoked, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on a registered partnership firm for failing to deliver declarations in Form No. 15H within the prescribed time under section 272A(2)(f) read with section 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s failure was deemed a bona fide mistake due to ignorance of the law, with no guilty intention or benefit derived from the delay, resulting in no loss to the revenue. As a result, the penalty was revoked, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>