<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act was unjustified as the valuation of shares was not definitive and both the assessee and Assessing Officer had qualified their values. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act was unjustified as the valuation of shares was not definitive and both the assessee and Assessing Officer had qualified their values. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>