<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 107 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63438</link>
    <description>The Delhi Bench lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal regarding the cancellation of interest charges. The Tribunal clarified that the Indore Bench had jurisdiction over appeals from Bhopal District as per the President&#039;s standing order. The incorrect filing before the Delhi Bench necessitated amending the memorandum of appeal and filing it before the competent Bench with the correct territorial jurisdiction. The appeal was ordered to be returned for necessary amendments and filing before the appropriate Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:06:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 107 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63438</link>
      <description>The Delhi Bench lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal regarding the cancellation of interest charges. The Tribunal clarified that the Indore Bench had jurisdiction over appeals from Bhopal District as per the President&#039;s standing order. The incorrect filing before the Delhi Bench necessitated amending the memorandum of appeal and filing it before the competent Bench with the correct territorial jurisdiction. The appeal was ordered to be returned for necessary amendments and filing before the appropriate Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>