<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(a) for assessment years 1982-83 and 1984-85, dismissing appeals challenging the penalties. The delay in filing returns due to the Chartered Accountant&#039;s illness was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the duty to comply with legal obligations despite counsel&#039;s absence. The Tribunal rejected arguments citing illness as a reasonable cause for delay, emphasizing the deterrent nature of penalties for ensuring compliance. Previous Tribunal orders and excess advance-tax payment were found insufficient defenses against penalties, with the Tribunal affirming lower authorities&#039; decisions and upholding the penalties for the respective assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(a) for assessment years 1982-83 and 1984-85, dismissing appeals challenging the penalties. The delay in filing returns due to the Chartered Accountant&#039;s illness was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the duty to comply with legal obligations despite counsel&#039;s absence. The Tribunal rejected arguments citing illness as a reasonable cause for delay, emphasizing the deterrent nature of penalties for ensuring compliance. Previous Tribunal orders and excess advance-tax payment were found insufficient defenses against penalties, with the Tribunal affirming lower authorities&#039; decisions and upholding the penalties for the respective assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>