<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of Rs. 52,741. The decision favored the appellant due to the lack of evidence supporting income concealment and the unavailability of impounded books for reconciliation, emphasizing the absence of fraud or wilful neglect in income reporting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of Rs. 52,741. The decision favored the appellant due to the lack of evidence supporting income concealment and the unavailability of impounded books for reconciliation, emphasizing the absence of fraud or wilful neglect in income reporting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>