<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, setting aside the AAC&#039;s orders and restoring the ITO&#039;s decisions for the assessment years in question. It clarified that the disallowance provisions under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act apply to all firms, regardless of registration status. The Tribunal emphasized that the distinction between registered and unregistered firms is significant for tax liability determination, not for total income computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, setting aside the AAC&#039;s orders and restoring the ITO&#039;s decisions for the assessment years in question. It clarified that the disallowance provisions under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act apply to all firms, regardless of registration status. The Tribunal emphasized that the distinction between registered and unregistered firms is significant for tax liability determination, not for total income computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>