<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains on the sale of jewellery should be based on the actual cost incurred at the time of acquisition, not the market value when the asset became a capital asset. The decision in CIT v. Bai Shirinbai K. Kooka was deemed inapplicable as it concerned business income, not capital gains. The Tribunal upheld the ITO&#039;s calculation of capital gains at Rs. 75,500, setting aside the AAC&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains on the sale of jewellery should be based on the actual cost incurred at the time of acquisition, not the market value when the asset became a capital asset. The decision in CIT v. Bai Shirinbai K. Kooka was deemed inapplicable as it concerned business income, not capital gains. The Tribunal upheld the ITO&#039;s calculation of capital gains at Rs. 75,500, setting aside the AAC&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>