<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the gross profit rate alone was insufficient to invoke Rule 2B(2) of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. The revenue&#039;s valuation method was rejected, and the deletion of the addition by the AAC was upheld. The appeals by the revenue were considered allowed only for statistical purposes, highlighting the necessity for more concrete evidence to establish market value exceeding the book value by more than 20%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the gross profit rate alone was insufficient to invoke Rule 2B(2) of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. The revenue&#039;s valuation method was rejected, and the deletion of the addition by the AAC was upheld. The appeals by the revenue were considered allowed only for statistical purposes, highlighting the necessity for more concrete evidence to establish market value exceeding the book value by more than 20%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>