<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of the land should be taken at Rs. 2,01,000 for computing the assessee&#039;s business profits. Additionally, the Tribunal found no merit in the department&#039;s contention regarding the addition of on-money and agreed that the additions should be deleted. The appeals were partly allowed, with the assessee succeeding on the major issues of cost of land and on-money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of the land should be taken at Rs. 2,01,000 for computing the assessee&#039;s business profits. Additionally, the Tribunal found no merit in the department&#039;s contention regarding the addition of on-money and agreed that the additions should be deleted. The appeals were partly allowed, with the assessee succeeding on the major issues of cost of land and on-money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>