<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63345</link>
    <description>Interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act could not be levied through a demand notice when the assessment order contained no specific direction for such levy. The Tribunal treated the omission to pass a proper charging order as a mistake apparent from the record, capable of rectification under section 154. On that basis, deletion of the interest demand was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:59:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63345</link>
      <description>Interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act could not be levied through a demand notice when the assessment order contained no specific direction for such levy. The Tribunal treated the omission to pass a proper charging order as a mistake apparent from the record, capable of rectification under section 154. On that basis, deletion of the interest demand was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>