<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances and additions in the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided genuine explanations and evidence, and the disallowances were not based on false claims or mala fide intentions. As a result, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances and additions in the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided genuine explanations and evidence, and the disallowances were not based on false claims or mala fide intentions. As a result, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>