<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the discount given to Prepaid Market Associates (PMAs) was not commission, making Section 194H inapplicable, and thus, no interest under Section 201(1A) could be levied. Additionally, the Tribunal found that interconnect/port charges were not payments for technical services, rendering Section 194J inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 355 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It determined that the discount given to Prepaid Market Associates (PMAs) was not commission, making Section 194H inapplicable, and thus, no interest under Section 201(1A) could be levied. Additionally, the Tribunal found that interconnect/port charges were not payments for technical services, rendering Section 194J inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>