https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63309 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the AO's determinations on the perquisite value of furnished accommodation and the gain on the sale of stock options. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the issue of non-pecuniary reductions from the base salary. The matter regarding charging of interest under section 234B was restored to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:39:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63309 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the AO's determinations on the perquisite value of furnished accommodation and the gain on the sale of stock options. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the issue of non-pecuniary reductions from the base salary. The matter regarding charging of interest under section 234B was restored to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63309