<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 215 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63303</link>
    <description>The ITAT DELHI-A ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeals and dismissing those of the Department. The Tribunal determined that the assessee was not in default under section 201(1) of the IT Act, 1961, and upheld the exclusion of the &quot;housing norm&quot; from salary for tax deduction purposes. It recognized the necessity of completing actions within a reasonable time when no statutory limit exists and accepted the assessee&#039;s plea regarding the non-deduction of tax at source for foreign salary components. Additionally, the Tribunal held that citizen tax in Japan, being diverted at source, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 215 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63303</link>
      <description>The ITAT DELHI-A ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeals and dismissing those of the Department. The Tribunal determined that the assessee was not in default under section 201(1) of the IT Act, 1961, and upheld the exclusion of the &quot;housing norm&quot; from salary for tax deduction purposes. It recognized the necessity of completing actions within a reasonable time when no statutory limit exists and accepted the assessee&#039;s plea regarding the non-deduction of tax at source for foreign salary components. Additionally, the Tribunal held that citizen tax in Japan, being diverted at source, should not be included in the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>