<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 183 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63302</link>
    <description>An integrated hotel marketing and reservation arrangement was held not to give rise to royalty or fees for included services because trademark use was incidental and no technical knowledge was made available in the treaty sense; the receipts were treated as business profits and, absent a permanent establishment, were not taxable in India. Reassessment for years with no original regular assessment was upheld because there was no prior opinion to amount to a change of opinion. In remand proceedings, the Assessing Officer could not tax amounts that had already attained finality outside the subject matter of appeal. Interest under section 234B was not leviable where tax was deductible at source, and SCI/SPG and FFP contributions were also held not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 183 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63302</link>
      <description>An integrated hotel marketing and reservation arrangement was held not to give rise to royalty or fees for included services because trademark use was incidental and no technical knowledge was made available in the treaty sense; the receipts were treated as business profits and, absent a permanent establishment, were not taxable in India. Reassessment for years with no original regular assessment was upheld because there was no prior opinion to amount to a change of opinion. In remand proceedings, the Assessing Officer could not tax amounts that had already attained finality outside the subject matter of appeal. Interest under section 234B was not leviable where tax was deductible at source, and SCI/SPG and FFP contributions were also held not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>