<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 337 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63286</link>
    <description>Omission to consider a binding Third Member decision was treated as a mistake apparent from the record, so the rectification application was allowed and the matter recalled for fresh hearing. The Tribunal also stated that interest under section 158BFA is statutory and cannot be waived or interfered with by any forum; that issue was decided against the assessee. The Chapter XIV-B estimation question was not finally determined and was left open for reconsideration in the rehearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 337 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63286</link>
      <description>Omission to consider a binding Third Member decision was treated as a mistake apparent from the record, so the rectification application was allowed and the matter recalled for fresh hearing. The Tribunal also stated that interest under section 158BFA is statutory and cannot be waived or interfered with by any forum; that issue was decided against the assessee. The Chapter XIV-B estimation question was not finally determined and was left open for reconsideration in the rehearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>