<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the undisclosed income of Rs. 1,69,87,776 should be taxed in the hands of Suresh Kumar, the sole proprietor of M/s Om Prakash Suresh Kumar. The additions in the hands of other family members and entities were deleted, as the undisclosed income was attributed to Suresh Kumar. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of the Rs. 5 lakhs addition for property purchase to the AO for fresh examination. All appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the undisclosed income of Rs. 1,69,87,776 should be taxed in the hands of Suresh Kumar, the sole proprietor of M/s Om Prakash Suresh Kumar. The additions in the hands of other family members and entities were deleted, as the undisclosed income was attributed to Suresh Kumar. The Tribunal also remanded the issue of the Rs. 5 lakhs addition for property purchase to the AO for fresh examination. All appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>