<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 316 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63270</link>
    <description>Technical assistance under a know-how arrangement was treated as fees for included services rather than business profits attributable to a permanent establishment in India. The services were limited to implementation of know-how and supervision to ensure that plant and equipment were erected according to the supplier&#039;s specifications; this did not amount to supervision of a building, construction, installation or assembly project for permanent establishment purposes. Reading the treaty business-profits and fees-for-included-services provisions together, the exclusion in the business-profits article operated where no permanent establishment existed in India. On those facts, the concessional 10% deduction applied and the higher 30% rate was not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 316 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63270</link>
      <description>Technical assistance under a know-how arrangement was treated as fees for included services rather than business profits attributable to a permanent establishment in India. The services were limited to implementation of know-how and supervision to ensure that plant and equipment were erected according to the supplier&#039;s specifications; this did not amount to supervision of a building, construction, installation or assembly project for permanent establishment purposes. Reading the treaty business-profits and fees-for-included-services provisions together, the exclusion in the business-profits article operated where no permanent establishment existed in India. On those facts, the concessional 10% deduction applied and the higher 30% rate was not applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>