<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 241 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63266</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the additions for unexplained cash credit. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, shifting the burden to the department to provide substantial evidence for rejection. Emphasizing the need for concrete material, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the Rs. 1 lakh addition to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 241 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63266</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the additions for unexplained cash credit. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, shifting the burden to the department to provide substantial evidence for rejection. Emphasizing the need for concrete material, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the Rs. 1 lakh addition to the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>