<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions of Rs. 24,03,000 and Rs. 7,00,000 related to property transactions for fresh adjudication, citing insufficient evidence and the need for further investigation. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 9,65,000 addition concerning payments from bookies, due to lack of incriminating evidence and breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions of Rs. 24,03,000 and Rs. 7,00,000 related to property transactions for fresh adjudication, citing insufficient evidence and the need for further investigation. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 9,65,000 addition concerning payments from bookies, due to lack of incriminating evidence and breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>