<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 260 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263, finding the AO&#039;s order prejudicial to Revenue due to errors in allowing deductions under Sections 80-I and 80HH. The Tribunal also ruled that the assessee failed to comply with the amended provisions of Section 36(1)(vii) by not properly writing off bad debts. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT&#039;s actions and decisions in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 260 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263, finding the AO&#039;s order prejudicial to Revenue due to errors in allowing deductions under Sections 80-I and 80HH. The Tribunal also ruled that the assessee failed to comply with the amended provisions of Section 36(1)(vii) by not properly writing off bad debts. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT&#039;s actions and decisions in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>