<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 223 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue on both issues. The surrendered amount of Rs. 20 lacs was classified as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of business income, denying the Section 80-I deduction. Additionally, the provision for the disputed electricity bill was disallowed for the relevant year, with the deduction to be claimed in the year of actual payment due to the uncertainty of the liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 223 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue on both issues. The surrendered amount of Rs. 20 lacs was classified as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of business income, denying the Section 80-I deduction. Additionally, the provision for the disputed electricity bill was disallowed for the relevant year, with the deduction to be claimed in the year of actual payment due to the uncertainty of the liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>