<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 107 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63230</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions made by the AO and CIT(A) in different expense categories. The additions were deemed unjustified as there were no specific defects or discrepancies found in the accounts maintained by the assessee. The ITAT concluded that the expenses were legitimate business expenses and were incurred in the ordinary course of business, leading to the deletion of the disallowances and additions made by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 107 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63230</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions made by the AO and CIT(A) in different expense categories. The additions were deemed unjustified as there were no specific defects or discrepancies found in the accounts maintained by the assessee. The ITAT concluded that the expenses were legitimate business expenses and were incurred in the ordinary course of business, leading to the deletion of the disallowances and additions made by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>