<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 146 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) due to repeated adjournment requests by the assessee for the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1976-77. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair hearing and directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the case promptly from the stage of filing the appeal before the first appellate authority. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 146 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) due to repeated adjournment requests by the assessee for the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1976-77. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair hearing and directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the case promptly from the stage of filing the appeal before the first appellate authority. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>