<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 144 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63205</link>
    <description>Concessional interest on a loan was treated as a taxable benefit where the lower borrowing cost itself conferred an actual advantage on the assessee, and the absence of proof of surplus idle funds or a direct fund nexus did not defeat the addition. Deduction under section 80T was required to be computed only after arriving at gross total income, so brought-forward capital losses had to be set off first under the Chapter VI-A scheme. An order demanding compulsory deposit under the 1974 Scheme was held appealable, and the assessee&#039;s liability was remanded for fresh examination because the exemption plea based on age had not been heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 144 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63205</link>
      <description>Concessional interest on a loan was treated as a taxable benefit where the lower borrowing cost itself conferred an actual advantage on the assessee, and the absence of proof of surplus idle funds or a direct fund nexus did not defeat the addition. Deduction under section 80T was required to be computed only after arriving at gross total income, so brought-forward capital losses had to be set off first under the Chapter VI-A scheme. An order demanding compulsory deposit under the 1974 Scheme was held appealable, and the assessee&#039;s liability was remanded for fresh examination because the exemption plea based on age had not been heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>