<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 86 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the addition of Rs. 96,000 as the explanations were deemed false. The penalty for Rs. 20,500 and Rs. 8,085 was canceled, while the penalty for Rs. 96,000 was upheld. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the penalty on the assessee was canceled due to lack of substantiated explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 86 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the addition of Rs. 96,000 as the explanations were deemed false. The penalty for Rs. 20,500 and Rs. 8,085 was canceled, while the penalty for Rs. 96,000 was upheld. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the penalty on the assessee was canceled due to lack of substantiated explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>