<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the cross objection by the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intentions or conscious concealment by the assessee, leading to the conclusion that the penalty provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the cross objection by the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intentions or conscious concealment by the assessee, leading to the conclusion that the penalty provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>