<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63182</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the estimation of property rent and undisclosed income issues. However, the matter of interest on borrowed sums was remanded for further examination to determine if the business was set up in the relevant years. The charging of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1)(a) of the IT Act was considered a consequential relief and required no further discussion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:41:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63182</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the estimation of property rent and undisclosed income issues. However, the matter of interest on borrowed sums was remanded for further examination to determine if the business was set up in the relevant years. The charging of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1)(a) of the IT Act was considered a consequential relief and required no further discussion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>