<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by accepting the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation rates on the hotel building, considering it a plant essential for the hotel business. The Tribunal dismissed the claim for disallowed entertainment expenditures, applying relevant tax provisions retrospectively. The orders of the authorities below were set aside for the depreciation issue, directing the ITO to allow depreciation at the higher rates on the hotel building.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by accepting the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation rates on the hotel building, considering it a plant essential for the hotel business. The Tribunal dismissed the claim for disallowed entertainment expenditures, applying relevant tax provisions retrospectively. The orders of the authorities below were set aside for the depreciation issue, directing the ITO to allow depreciation at the higher rates on the hotel building.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>