<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT (A)&#039;s decision and upheld the ITO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 3,40,000 interest on loans, finding that borrowed funds were used for non-business purposes based on debit balances in partners&#039; accounts and interest-free advances to related parties. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning and concluded that the disallowance was justified, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:08:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT (A)&#039;s decision and upheld the ITO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 3,40,000 interest on loans, finding that borrowed funds were used for non-business purposes based on debit balances in partners&#039; accounts and interest-free advances to related parties. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning and concluded that the disallowance was justified, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>