<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 154 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 of the IT Act, emphasizing the importance of considering seized diary entries during assessments and ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard. The appeal was rejected, affirming the necessity for a thorough assessment process in compliance with the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 154 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under s. 263 of the IT Act, emphasizing the importance of considering seized diary entries during assessments and ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard. The appeal was rejected, affirming the necessity for a thorough assessment process in compliance with the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>