<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63112</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, granting registration to the firm from 17th January 1976 to 22nd October 1976. However, the firm was deemed unregistered for the period before 17th January 1976 due to non-compliance with profit distribution terms in the partnership deed. This decision was based on the firm&#039;s fulfillment of legal formalities during the specified period, aligning with a precedent allowing registration for a specific timeframe contingent on procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63112</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, granting registration to the firm from 17th January 1976 to 22nd October 1976. However, the firm was deemed unregistered for the period before 17th January 1976 due to non-compliance with profit distribution terms in the partnership deed. This decision was based on the firm&#039;s fulfillment of legal formalities during the specified period, aligning with a precedent allowing registration for a specific timeframe contingent on procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>