<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63048</link>
    <description>Valid service of a section 143(2) notice must comply with section 282 of the Income-tax Act, including proper delivery by post or as a summons and service on a partner or other authorised recipient in the case of a firm. Service on an employee or unrelated person is insufficient unless authority is proved, and where service is through a process server, the Revenue must adduce admissible evidence identifying the person served and the mode of delivery. On the facts stated, the notice was received by a person who was neither a partner nor an authorised agent, and valid service within time was not proved; the consequent assessment was invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63048</link>
      <description>Valid service of a section 143(2) notice must comply with section 282 of the Income-tax Act, including proper delivery by post or as a summons and service on a partner or other authorised recipient in the case of a firm. Service on an employee or unrelated person is insufficient unless authority is proved, and where service is through a process server, the Revenue must adduce admissible evidence identifying the person served and the mode of delivery. On the facts stated, the notice was received by a person who was neither a partner nor an authorised agent, and valid service within time was not proved; the consequent assessment was invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>