<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 84 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63025</link>
    <description>The ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the benefits of section 11 of the IT Act. The decision was based on compliance with statutory requirements during assessment proceedings, citing the deeming provision of section 139(4A) and previous ITAT decisions. The ITAT emphasized that filing the audit report before the ITO during proceedings fulfilled the requirements, allowing the assessee to claim exemption under section 11 despite initial non-compliance with section 12A (b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 84 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63025</link>
      <description>The ITAT rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the benefits of section 11 of the IT Act. The decision was based on compliance with statutory requirements during assessment proceedings, citing the deeming provision of section 139(4A) and previous ITAT decisions. The ITAT emphasized that filing the audit report before the ITO during proceedings fulfilled the requirements, allowing the assessee to claim exemption under section 11 despite initial non-compliance with section 12A (b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>