<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63018</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of compensation as the appellant failed to establish business justification and the arbitration award lacked validity. The judgment emphasized procedural irregularities in the arbitration process and the absence of proven liabilities to support the compensation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63018</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of compensation as the appellant failed to establish business justification and the arbitration award lacked validity. The judgment emphasized procedural irregularities in the arbitration process and the absence of proven liabilities to support the compensation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>