<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 281 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62952</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on profit computation and remanding the matter to the AO for fresh determination. The Tribunal emphasized that profits should be determined by spreading the estimated cost of development over the saleable area of the plots, aligning with relevant case law. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of various expenses and directed the AO to recompute interest charges in accordance with its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 281 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62952</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on profit computation and remanding the matter to the AO for fresh determination. The Tribunal emphasized that profits should be determined by spreading the estimated cost of development over the saleable area of the plots, aligning with relevant case law. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of various expenses and directed the AO to recompute interest charges in accordance with its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>