<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 150 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62921</link>
    <description>Entertainment tax collected under a State scheme was treated as a revenue receipt, and deduction under section 43B was available where the statutory liability was discharged through adjustment entries sanctioned by the competent authority. Rent and service charges from the bank portion of the building were assessed as income from other sources, not business income, because the letting was primarily for rent and only incidental facilities were provided. Depreciation on the cinema portion required proper apportionment of combined building cost, while the plea to treat the cinema building as plant was remitted for reconsideration. The disallowances on travelling, directors&#039; remuneration, repair and maintenance, and interest-free advance were substantially deleted or reduced on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:06:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 150 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62921</link>
      <description>Entertainment tax collected under a State scheme was treated as a revenue receipt, and deduction under section 43B was available where the statutory liability was discharged through adjustment entries sanctioned by the competent authority. Rent and service charges from the bank portion of the building were assessed as income from other sources, not business income, because the letting was primarily for rent and only incidental facilities were provided. Depreciation on the cinema portion required proper apportionment of combined building cost, while the plea to treat the cinema building as plant was remitted for reconsideration. The disallowances on travelling, directors&#039; remuneration, repair and maintenance, and interest-free advance were substantially deleted or reduced on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>