<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 272A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the assessee had complied with the summons to the extent required, and the DC&#039;s omnibus summons lacked proper application of mind and specificity. The Tribunal emphasized that the requirement for personal attendance and the production of all documents was unreasonable and not justified in the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 272A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the assessee had complied with the summons to the extent required, and the DC&#039;s omnibus summons lacked proper application of mind and specificity. The Tribunal emphasized that the requirement for personal attendance and the production of all documents was unreasonable and not justified in the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>