<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the lower authorities&#039; decision to capitalize the interest amount under Explanation 8 to section 43(1). The judgment emphasized the importance of statutory interpretation, legislative intent, and judicial precedents in resolving issues related to the treatment of interest paid on borrowed funds for business expenditures and actual cost calculations for assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the lower authorities&#039; decision to capitalize the interest amount under Explanation 8 to section 43(1). The judgment emphasized the importance of statutory interpretation, legislative intent, and judicial precedents in resolving issues related to the treatment of interest paid on borrowed funds for business expenditures and actual cost calculations for assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>