<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 66 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of income concealment by the assessee, as discrepancies were discovered in duplicate cash books during a search operation. The Tribunal overturned the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision and reinstated the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Officer. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful, emphasizing the lack of relevant information provided by the assessee and the presence of incriminating documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 66 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of income concealment by the assessee, as discrepancies were discovered in duplicate cash books during a search operation. The Tribunal overturned the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision and reinstated the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Officer. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful, emphasizing the lack of relevant information provided by the assessee and the presence of incriminating documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>