<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Income-tax authorities&#039; decision, ruling against the appellant and determining the expenditure of Rs. 11,310 as non-business expenditure. The judgment emphasizes the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure in the context of expenses related to the issue of additional equity shares, highlighting the importance of judicial precedents in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Income-tax authorities&#039; decision, ruling against the appellant and determining the expenditure of Rs. 11,310 as non-business expenditure. The judgment emphasizes the distinction between revenue and capital expenditure in the context of expenses related to the issue of additional equity shares, highlighting the importance of judicial precedents in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>