<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 49(1)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act did not apply, determining that the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains should be the revalued cost at dissolution. The firm was classified as a new partnership firm distinct from the dissolved firm, with the Tribunal emphasizing legal principles and specific facts to support its decision. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the assessee&#039;s capital gain computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 49(1)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act did not apply, determining that the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains should be the revalued cost at dissolution. The firm was classified as a new partnership firm distinct from the dissolved firm, with the Tribunal emphasizing legal principles and specific facts to support its decision. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the assessee&#039;s capital gain computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>