<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,66,776 as income under section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the car provided by a non-resident firm was intended for official use, not personal use or ownership by the assessee. As the car was eventually re-exported due to defects without benefit derived by the assessee, the inclusion of the amount as income was deemed unwarranted. The departmental appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:31:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,66,776 as income under section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the car provided by a non-resident firm was intended for official use, not personal use or ownership by the assessee. As the car was eventually re-exported due to defects without benefit derived by the assessee, the inclusion of the amount as income was deemed unwarranted. The departmental appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>