<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 152 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to treat the Rs. 2 lakhs expenditure as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was deemed redundant and dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal also did not entertain a modified cross-objection raised by the assessee as it was filed after the prescribed limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 152 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to treat the Rs. 2 lakhs expenditure as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross-objection filed by the assessee was deemed redundant and dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal also did not entertain a modified cross-objection raised by the assessee as it was filed after the prescribed limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>