<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62814</link>
    <description>A fresh ground challenging inclusion of interest on short-term deposits was held not entertainable when it was raised for the first time before the Tribunal and had not been decided by the first appellate authority; a new issue requiring further investigation falls outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction. Depreciation on construction equipment was also denied because the plant and machinery were not actually used during the year, and mere readiness for use was insufficient where the business had not commenced. The Tribunal therefore rejected the additional grounds and disallowed depreciation on the idle equipment, granting relief only to the limited extent recorded in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:45:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62814</link>
      <description>A fresh ground challenging inclusion of interest on short-term deposits was held not entertainable when it was raised for the first time before the Tribunal and had not been decided by the first appellate authority; a new issue requiring further investigation falls outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction. Depreciation on construction equipment was also denied because the plant and machinery were not actually used during the year, and mere readiness for use was insufficient where the business had not commenced. The Tribunal therefore rejected the additional grounds and disallowed depreciation on the idle equipment, granting relief only to the limited extent recorded in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>