<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 81 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s orders, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the deduction of Rs. 8,76,215 under section 40A(7) and the higher depreciation rate on &#039;pay loaders.&#039; Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,22,27,078 to the total income of the assessee, ruling that it was a diversion of income by overriding title and not a mere application of profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=101228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 81 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s orders, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the deduction of Rs. 8,76,215 under section 40A(7) and the higher depreciation rate on &#039;pay loaders.&#039; Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,22,27,078 to the total income of the assessee, ruling that it was a diversion of income by overriding title and not a mere application of profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>